[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles
How can it be other than a MUST? If two entities have the same handle, then they are, by definition, the same entity. This is not even a MUST - it is evident by the very nature of the definition of a handle as a unique identifier of something. -----Original Message----- From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com] Sent: Wed, October 09, 2002 06:38 To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles Topic: Interface Class: Technical Raised by: Rich Thompson Title: Uniqueness of entityHandles Date Added: 9-Oct-2002 Document Section: Interfaces/6 Description: Do we want a statement about uniqueness of entity handles within the scope of a registration? Would it be a SHOULD or a MUST? ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC