[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#111] getMarkup called for MINIMIZE
I'm somewhat troubled by this. However, I think we need to see this in operation before we decide if anything needs to be done explicitly. Rex At 1:11 PM +0200 10/27/02, Gil Tayar wrote: >The semantics can be Consumer-facing, i.e. "the Consumer should assume that >the markup generates no markup that creates a visible change when rendered". > >I believe this semantic to be logical to the Consumer and producer, and >useful to the Consumer. > >Gil > >-----Original Message----- >From: Andre Kramer [mailto:andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com] >Sent: Thu, October 24, 2002 16:48 >To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#111] getMarkup called for MINIMIZE > > >Seems hard to tell "non-visible data such as javascript or hidden forms" >(0.7/0.8) from visible content though ... >I would rather see no or any mark-up for MINIMIZE rather than "non-visible". >PREVIEW is suggested in a JSR 168 appendix. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com] >Sent: 24 October 2002 15:41 >To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] [I#111] getMarkup called for MINIMIZE > > > > > > > >I think we do want well defined semantics for each of the window states. I >would prefer to leave the MINIMIZED as is and have vendors use a customized >window state (ICONIZED?) for the suggested extension. > > > > > > Gil Tayar > > <Gil.Tayar@webcol To: >"'wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org'" > lage.com> ><wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org> > cc: > > 10/15/2002 02:23 Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#111] >getMarkup called for MINIMIZE > AM > > > > > > > > >Status: Active >Topic: Interface >Class: Minor Technical >Raised by: Andre Kramer >Date Added: 15-Oct-2002 >Section: Interfaces/7.7.2 >Title: getMarkup called for MINIMIZE >Description: >"free to include non-visible data such as jscript or hidden forms". If a >getMarkup(windowState.MINIMIZED ...) can generate any mark up at all why >not just let the consumer deal with details of what is included for >aggregation? E.g. Portal may want to show a very small pre-view bitmap of >the content. ><RDT>I would prefer this be reworked into a suggested change in the text >that people could then directly debate.</RDT> > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> -- Rex Brooks Starbourne Communications Design 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA 94702 *510-849-2309 http://www.starbourne.com * rexb@starbourne.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC