[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)
Against... G > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Schaeck [mailto:SCHAECK@de.ibm.com] > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:41 AM > To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined) > > > > > Dear WSRP and WSIA TC Members, > > I put up the following issue for an e-mail vote (ending 1 > week after this > notice goes out) - the following summarizes the discussion > for this issue > (thanks Rich !) > > Issue #59 (refined) - Keep the wsdlURL field in ServiceDescription? > > Arguments in favor: > - If this was an infrastructural portType (has that flavor), > this would be > THE required field. > - This provides a standardized place to produce a dynamic WSDL that > reflects the Consumer's registration. > > Arguments against: > - Since we are above the infrastructural level, this > information has to be > already known in order to invoke getServiceDescription(). > - If the infrastructural level provides such information in > the future, it > will be redundant and likely incompatible > - Not critical for v1.0 ... can be an extension for those wishing to > provide the dynamic WSDL concept. > - Assumes the signature will not change for future versions > of the spec. > - Belongs as part of the discovery process rather than as part of the > service. > > Best regards, > > Thomas > > Thomas Schaeck > Chairman OASIS WSRP TC > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC