[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)
I vote NO. bill cox Thomas Schaeck wrote: > Dear WSRP and WSIA TC Members, > > I put up the following issue for an e-mail vote (ending 1 week after this > notice goes out) - the following summarizes the discussion for this issue > (thanks Rich !) > > Issue #59 (refined) - Keep the wsdlURL field in ServiceDescription? > > Arguments in favor: > - If this was an infrastructural portType (has that flavor), this would be > THE required field. > - This provides a standardized place to produce a dynamic WSDL that > reflects the Consumer's registration. > > Arguments against: > - Since we are above the infrastructural level, this information has to be > already known in order to invoke getServiceDescription(). > - If the infrastructural level provides such information in the future, it > will be redundant and likely incompatible > - Not critical for v1.0 ... can be an extension for those wishing to > provide the dynamic WSDL concept. > - Assumes the signature will not change for future versions of the spec. > - Belongs as part of the discovery process rather than as part of the > service. > > Best regards, > > Thomas > > Thomas Schaeck > Chairman OASIS WSRP TC > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
Attachment:
william.cox.vcf
Description: Card for William Cox
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC