[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)
No At 05:40 PM 11/15/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Dear WSRP and WSIA TC Members, > >I put up the following issue for an e-mail vote (ending 1 week after this >notice goes out) - the following summarizes the discussion for this issue >(thanks Rich !) > >Issue #59 (refined) - Keep the wsdlURL field in ServiceDescription? > >Arguments in favor: > - If this was an infrastructural portType (has that flavor), this would be >THE required field. > - This provides a standardized place to produce a dynamic WSDL that >reflects the Consumer's registration. > >Arguments against: > - Since we are above the infrastructural level, this information has to be >already known in order to invoke getServiceDescription(). > - If the infrastructural level provides such information in the future, it >will be redundant and likely incompatible > - Not critical for v1.0 ... can be an extension for those wishing to >provide the dynamic WSDL concept. > - Assumes the signature will not change for future versions of the spec. > - Belongs as part of the discovery process rather than as part of the >service. > >Best regards, > >Thomas > >Thomas Schaeck >Chairman OASIS WSRP TC > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >. Steven Smith Director of Information Services and Technology Capitol College
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC