Fw: [Fwd: A minor error in WSRP 0.95 spec]

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

Another forwarded comment.

Rich Thompson
----- Forwarded by Rich
Thompson/Watson/IBM on 07/09/2003 02:04 PM -----

Michael Freedman <Michael.Freedman@oracle.com> 04/24/2003 12:35 PM

To:        Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS         cc:                 Subject:        [Fwd: A minor error in WSRP 0.95 spec]

FYI ...

-------- Original Message --------

Return-Path:	<andrew.wright@oracle.com>
Received:	from rgmum3.us.oracle.com by rgmum2.us.oracle.com with ESMTP id 1825469261051193268; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:07:48 -0600
Return-Path:	<andrew.wright@oracle.com>
Received:	from ukp13278.uk.oracle.com by rgmum6.us.oracle.com with ESMTP id 113643611051193211; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:06:51 -0400
Message-ID:	<3EA7EFB6.7010101@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:07:50 +0100
From:	Andrew Wright <andrew.wright@oracle.com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:	en, en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"MICHAEL.FREEDMAN" <MICHAEL.FREEDMAN@oracle.com>
Subject:	A minor error in WSRP 0.95 spec
Content-Type:	text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:	7bit

Hi Mike,

I just noticed in 0.95 of the WSRP spec pg 64, ln 20, an URL rewriting
example is given as:

wsrp-rewrite?wsrp-urlType=blockingAction&wsrp-secureURL=true&wsrp-navigationalState=a8h4K5JD9&interactionState=fg4h923mdk/wsrp-rewrite

I think it should be:

wsrp-rewrite?wsrp-urlType=blockingAction&wsrp-secureURL=true&wsrp-navigationalState=a8h4K5JD9&wsrp-interactionState=fg4h923mdk/wsrp-rewrite

Thanks,

    Andy.