[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp] Re: [wsrp-comment] Issues with wsrp_services.wsdl
One more comment on the WSDL.
Should our service wsdl contain both services or would we prefer one
service wsdl per version?
For backwards compatibility I would expect that most 1.0 consumers wouldn't
be able to filter out the 1.0 service if multiple services were present in
the WSDL.
Although not normative and WSDL allows to have more than one service
element in it, it could be cleaner to seperate them anyway?
Do we intend to have a logical tie between the 1.0 service and the 2.0
service? I.e. can we exchange handles across the version specific bindings?
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
WSRP Technical Lead
WSRP Standardization
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
"Subbu
Allamaraju"
<subbu@bea.com> To
Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,
08/14/06 06:53 PM "Nathan Lipke" <nlipke@bea.com>
cc
"Rich Thompson"
<richt2@us.ibm.com>,
<wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject
RE: [wsrp] Re: [wsrp-comment]
Issues with wsrp_services.wsdl
Just noticed that there is a minor problem with the binding names used in
the V2 spec. The names used (e.g. WSRPv2ServiceDescription_Binding_SOAP)
don't match those specified in the v2 bindings file (which uses
WSRP_v2_ServiceDescription_Binding_SOAP).
The same is the case with portTypes.
Sec 15 of the spec should be fixed to use the same names.
Subbu
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Jacob [mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com]
Sent: Fri 8/11/2006 2:27 AM
To: Nathan Lipke
Cc: Rich Thompson; wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsrp] Re: [wsrp-comment] Issues with wsrp_services.wsdl
just to clarify and split hairs:
The only reliable way for a consumer to determine the correct port is the
binding attribute on the wsdl:port element. It is not the name attribute of
the port. The name attribute can be changed in any arbitrary way as well as
the service name attribute.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
WSRP Technical Lead
WSRP Standardization
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
Nathan E Lipke
<nlipke@bea.com>
To
08/10/06 10:04 PM Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
cc
wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
[wsrp] Re: [wsrp-comment] Issues
with wsrp_services.wsdl
Yes its public review comment.
Rich Thompson wrote:
While I don't have a problem with the rework suggested, it is a bug
if v1 Consumers are expecting all Producer to use the same name for
their service elements as this is not required either by WSDL or
WSRP. The implementation should look at either the binding or
portType names to ensure compatibility (defined by the TC and
therefore constant).
By the way; are you intending this as a public review comment such
that the changes actually appear in what becomes the v2 package of
files?
Rich
Nathan E Lipke <nlipke@bea.com>
08/10/2006 01:07 PM To
wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis
-open.org
cc
Subject
[wsrp-interfaces] Issues
with wsrp_services.wsdl
I've found a couple of issues of with the wsrp_services.wsdl posted
on oasis.
1st the service and port names for were changed from v1
This may break v1 consumers looking for specific service
and port names
The targetNamespace is v2 for all ports and services
Again may cause issues v1 consumers
I would like to propose keeping the v1 wsrp_services.wsdl
as it was in v1 and having the v2 wsdl import the v1
wsdl.
I attached samples of this (Note: wsrp_service.wsdl is
version #4 (2003-04-17) from the Oasis site).
Thanks,
Nate
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any
attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries
and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary,
copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of
the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the
intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please
immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<wsdl:definitions
targetNamespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v2:wsdl"
xmlns:v2bind="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v2:bind"
xmlns:v1bind="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:bind"
xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
xmlns:wsdl=
"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
xmlns:soap=
"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/";>
<!-- The following causes the required WSRP v2
definitions to be used -->
<import namespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v2:bind"
location="wsrp_v2_bindings.wsdl"/>
<!-- Since this wsdl includes both v1 and v2 service
elements, the Consumer will expect resources (e.g.
registrationHandle, registrationState, etc) can cross the
service boundaries -->
<import namespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:wsdl"
location="wsrp_service.wsdl"/>
<!-- A service definition encapsulating the WSRP v2
support of this Producer -->
<wsdl:service name="WSRP_v2_Service">
<wsdl:port
binding="v2bind:WSRP_v2_Markup_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRP_v2_Markup_Service">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8082/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
<wsdl:port
binding="v2bind:WSRP_v2_ServiceDescription_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRP_v2_ServiceDescription_Service">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8082/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
<wsdl:port
binding="v2bind:WSRP_v2_Registration_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRP_v2_Registration_Service">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8082/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
<wsdl:port
binding="v2bind:WSRP_v2_PortletManagement_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRP_v2_PortletManagement_Service">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8082/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
</wsdl:service>
</wsdl:definitions>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<wsdl:definitions
targetNamespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:wsdl"
xmlns:bind="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:bind"
xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
xmlns:wsdl=
"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
xmlns:soap=
"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/";>
<import namespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:bind"
location="wsrp_v1_bindings.wsdl"/>
<wsdl:service name="WSRPService">
<wsdl:port binding="bind:WSRP_v1_Markup_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRPBaseService">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8080/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
<wsdl:port
binding="bind:WSRP_v1_ServiceDescription_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRPServiceDescriptionService">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8080/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
<wsdl:port
binding="bind:WSRP_v1_Registration_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRPRegistrationService">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8080/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
<wsdl:port
binding="bind:WSRP_v1_PortletManagement_Binding_SOAP"
name="WSRPPortletManagementService">
<soap:address location=
"http://my.service:8080/WSRPService"/>
</wsdl:port>
</wsdl:service>
</wsdl:definitions>
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]