[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wss] Proposed interop logistics
Just for ref, Baltimore will also be there (couldn't get off mute a couple of weeks back when it was asked who'd be there); myself and possibly Irving. Merlin r/hlockhar@bea.com/2003.05.30/17:42:53 > > My list of things we need: > > > > Ethernet ports how many? (3-4) per company? is that too many - I > assume RJ45, not wireless > > Static IP addresses - might be easier to give each company 10 or so > > DNS ? are we going to omit the use of DNS? > > We need the two X.509 certificates > > What about clock synchronization? - set them manually? > > Proposed list of usernames and passwords: > > > > Chris - sirhC > > Kelvin - nivleK > > Phill - llihP > > Tony - ynoT > > Ron - noR > > John - nhoJ > > Hal - laH > > Jerry - yrreJ > > Steve - evetS > > Eric - cirE > > > > I think it would be a better use of time to pair off and test in > pairs, assuming most people have clients and servers. We can > informally switch off as people are ready. We can still use the matrix > to track our progress as you suggest. > > > > The experience at the SAML interop suggests that implementations may > stop working as a result of other fixes. I suggest, time permitting, > that once we believe everybody interops with everybody else, we do a > code freeze and a final run thru the matrix. That way everybody can > take home code that is known to work. > > > > Hal > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Kaler [mailto:ckaler@microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:17 AM > To: WSS > Subject: [wss] Proposed interop logistics > > Here is a proposal - what do people think? > > > 1. We will have Ethernet for everyone testing. > > 2. Everyone will be assigned a static IP address (192.168.1.*) > > 3. We construct a matrix for each of the interop tests of who has > client and server code > > 4. For each test we sequentially use each server implementation > > a. Put the server IP address on the wall > > b. Test from each client > > c. Debug/record results > > > Thoughts? > > Chris ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]