OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: OASIS submission ballot invalid? Re: [wss] WSS TC ballots - second reminder


Hi,
   Not to be a procedural wonk, but doesn't this mean that the second 
ballot is "out of order" and "invalid"? Assuming the first ballot passes, 
then there needs to be another public review, and no substantive changes as 
a result of that review, before that document can be proposed as an OASIS 
standard?
    cheers,
     jeff

At 08:40 PM 1/22/2004, Ron Monzillo wrote:
>Jerry,
>
>I share your opinion that substantive changes were made to the spec,
>and that we should conduct another review cycle.
>
>Therefore, I have also voted NO on the ballot "Submit to OASIS for final 
>approval ?".
>
>Ron
>
>Jerry Schwarz wrote:
>
>>At 02:06 PM 1/21/2004, Kelvin Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>>Apparently the system failed to send the automatic reminder it was 
>>>supposed to send today so I am sending another reminder to you all to 
>>>vote in the currently open ballots.
>>>
>>>We are now more than half-way through the work week and a great many of 
>>>us have yet to vote - please do vote soon so we can begin collating the 
>>>results prior to our TC call next week. Many thanks!
>>>
>>>I will send a final reminder later in the week.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Kelvin
>>
>>
>>FYI. I have just voted yes on making this a CD, but no on submitting for 
>>final with the comment attached below.
>>
>>-----------------
>>Oracle believes that there have been too many changes to the documents to 
>>advance it to final status another public review period.
>>
>>According to the OASIS Procedures. " If substantive changes are made to 
>>the specification after the start of the public review then the TC should 
>>conduct another review cycle".
>>
>>I will cite as one instance of a substantive change the change from QName 
>>to URI for the valuetype attributes.
>>
>>------------------------
>>
>>Rereading the comment I see a missing "without" and a typo. The first 
>>sentence should read
>>
>>"Oracle believes that there have been too many changes to the documents 
>>to advance them to final status without another public review period."
>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
>>the OASIS TC), go to 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
>the OASIS TC), go to 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>

Jeff Mischkinsky                      jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Consulting Member Technical Staff     +1(650)506-1975
Director, Web Services Standards      500 Oracle Parkway M/S 4OP9
Oracle Corporation                    Redwood Shores, CA 94065



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]