[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wss] Note that no editorial edits are permitted to the specdocuments if we approve the spec...
Philpott, Robert wrote: > > As Rich said, "substantive" is a subjective term. In the SSTC, we > considered it to mean anything that affected normative text in the spec > or anything in the schema files other than documentation. I personally > prefer that definition, but it doesn't mean that WSS has to use the same > definition. fyi/fwiw: [security-services] Process and timeline for V1.1 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200304/msg00133.html [security-services] updated -- SSTC "Committee Last Call" process http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200202/msg00176.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]