[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wss] about Hitachi's negative vote
Michael, While it's true that WS-I can resolve this ambiguity, I think that Kudo-san is correct that this ambiguity should be resolved in the actual specification. Anne At 10:33 AM 4/5/2004, Michael McIntosh wrote: >Kudo-san, > >This appears to be the first time this problem (from the 3rd interop) has >been discussed on the list. As you know the WS-I BSP WG is working on a >profile in an attempt to address issues such as this. I encourage you and >all vendors to participate in the BSP WG to insure that the profile covers >any interop failures you encounter during testing. For future reference, >Ted Burghart is the Hitachi representative to the WG. > >I will submit the following proposal to the BSP WG for statements to be >added to the profile: > >URI fragments defined in WSS: SOAP Message Security 1.0 are relative to a >base URI of >http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0 > > >URI fragments defined in WSS: UsernameToken Profile 1.0 are relative to a >base URI of >http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0 > > >URI fragments defined in WSS: X.509 Certificate Token Profile 1.0 are >relative to a base URI of >http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2003/12/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0 > >Thanks, >Mike McIntosh ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Anne Thomas Manes VP & Research Director Burton Group
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]