[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wss] Namespaces problem with Final XSD (was RE: [wss] Interop 3 draft results)
AHA!...Can you please upload the "correct" version of docs to the public site?
thanks,
dims
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Nadalin [mailto:drsecure@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Sat 4/17/2004 8:45 AM
To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [wss] Namespaces problem with Final XSD (was RE: [wss] Interop 3 draft results)
In closing down and publishing the specification we were asked by Karl best
to remove the "www" out of the namespace, so the correct namespaces are:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd
Above is what is in the documents that I have, it looks like I may have
posted a in transition oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0 document.
As it looks like lines 185-189 and 197-198 are not the same, 197-198 are
correct and 185-189 are wrong
Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122
"Srinivas,
Davanum M"
<Davanum.Srinivas To
@ca.com> "Chris Kaler"
<ckaler@microsoft.com>,
04/17/2004 05:58 <wss@lists.oasis-open.org>
AM cc
Subject
[wss] Namespaces problem with Final
XSD (was RE: [wss] Interop 3 draft
results)
Folks,
I checked a few WSDL's and our implementation and found that we were
using the following namespace:
http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-u
tility-1.0.xsd
BUT the final Schema XSD uses:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utili
ty-1.0.xsd
BUT the final PDF uses:
http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-u
tility-1.0.xsd
So what's the scoop?
Thanks,
dims
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Kaler [mailto:ckaler@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:28 AM
To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wss] Interop 3 draft results
Here is a first pass at merging all of the data I received. All
participants should review the data for correctness. There is still
some missing data.
Of the 339 tests, 80% passed, 11% failed, and 9% are still unknown.
Great work everyone!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Scenario 1
WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - P P P P P P P P
BEA P - P P P P P P P
BeTrusted P ? - P ? ? P P ?
CG P P P - P P P P P
Hitatchi P P P P - P P P P
MSFT P P P P P - P P P
Sun P P P P P P P - P
Systinet P P P P P P P P -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Scenario 2
WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - P P - P P P P P
BEA P - F - ? P P P F
BeTrusted P ? - - ? ? P P ?
CG - - - - - - - - -
Hitatchi P P P - - P P P P
MSFT P P P - P P P P P
Sun P P P - P P P - P
Systinet P P P - P P P P -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Scenario 3
WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - P P - P P P P F
BEA P - F - ? P P P F
BeTrusted P ? - - ? ? P P ?
Hitatchi P P P - - P P P P
MSFT P P P - P - P P P
Sun P P P - P P P - F
Systinet F F F - P P P F -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Scenario 4
WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P P P P P P F
BeTrusted P - - ? ? ? P P ?
CG P - P - P P ? P P
Hitatchi P - P P - P P P P
MSFT P - P P P - P P P
Sun P - P P P P P - F
Systinet F - F P P P P F -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Scenario 5
WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P P P P - P P
BEA P - F ? P P P P P
BeTrusted P - - P ? ? P P ?
CG P - P - P P ? P F
Hitatchi P - P P - P P P P
MSFT P - P P P - P P P
Sun P - P P P P P - P
Systinet F - P F P P P F -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Scenario 6
WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P - P P P P F
BeTrusted P - - - ? ? P P F
Hitatchi P - P - - P P P P
MSFT P - P - P - P P P
Sun P - P - P P P - F
Systinet F - F - P P P F -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Scenario 7
WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P - P P P F F
BeTrusted P -` - - ? ? ? P ?
Hitatchi P - P - - P P P F
MSFT P - P - P - P P F
Sun P - P - P P F - F
Systinet F - F - F F P F -
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup
.php.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php
.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
