RE: [wss] Namespaces problem with Final XSD (was RE: [wss] Interop 3 draftresults)

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>]

I will work with Chris, Kelvin and Karl to see what to do as these were publishing issues.

Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122
"Srinivas, Davanum M" <Davanum.Srinivas@ca.com>

"Srinivas, Davanum M" <Davanum.Srinivas@ca.com>

04/17/2004 08:20 AM

To	Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, <wss@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [wss] Namespaces problem with Final XSD (was RE: [wss] Interop 3 draft results)

AHA!...Can you please upload the "correct" version of docs to the public site?

thanks,
dims

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Nadalin [mailto:drsecure@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Sat 4/17/2004 8:45 AM
To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [wss] Namespaces problem with Final XSD (was RE: [wss] Interop 3 draft results)





In closing down and publishing the specification we were asked by Karl best
to remove the "www" out of the namespace, so the correct namespaces are:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd


Above is what is in the documents that I have, it looks like I may have
posted a in transition oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0 document.
As it looks like lines 185-189 and 197-198 are not the same, 197-198 are
correct and 185-189 are wrong

Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122



"Srinivas,
Davanum M"
<Davanum.Srinivas To
@ca.com> "Chris Kaler"
<ckaler@microsoft.com>,
04/17/2004 05:58 <wss@lists.oasis-open.org>
AM cc

Subject
[wss] Namespaces problem with Final
XSD (was RE: [wss] Interop 3 draft
results)










Folks,

I checked a few WSDL's and our implementation and found that we were
using the following namespace:
http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-u
tility-1.0.xsd

BUT the final Schema XSD uses:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utili
ty-1.0.xsd

BUT the final PDF uses:
http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-u
tility-1.0.xsd

So what's the scoop?

Thanks,
dims

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Kaler [mailto:ckaler@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:28 AM
To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wss] Interop 3 draft results


Here is a first pass at merging all of the data I received. All
participants should review the data for correctness. There is still
some missing data.

Of the 339 tests, 80% passed, 11% failed, and 9% are still unknown.

Great work everyone!!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Scenario 1

WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - P P P P P P P P
BEA P - P P P P P P P
BeTrusted P ? - P ? ? P P ?
CG P P P - P P P P P
Hitatchi P P P P - P P P P
MSFT P P P P P - P P P
Sun P P P P P P P - P
Systinet P P P P P P P P -

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Scenario 2

WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - P P - P P P P P
BEA P - F - ? P P P F
BeTrusted P ? - - ? ? P P ?
CG - - - - - - - - -
Hitatchi P P P - - P P P P
MSFT P P P - P P P P P
Sun P P P - P P P - P
Systinet P P P - P P P P -

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Scenario 3

WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - P P - P P P P F
BEA P - F - ? P P P F
BeTrusted P ? - - ? ? P P ?
Hitatchi P P P - - P P P P
MSFT P P P - P - P P P
Sun P P P - P P P - F
Systinet F F F - P P P F -

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Scenario 4

WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P P P P P P F
BeTrusted P - - ? ? ? P P ?
CG P - P - P P ? P P
Hitatchi P - P P - P P P P
MSFT P - P P P - P P P
Sun P - P P P P P - F
Systinet F - F P P P P F -

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Scenario 5

WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P P P P - P P
BEA P - F ? P P P P P
BeTrusted P - - P ? ? P P ?
CG P - P - P P ? P F
Hitatchi P - P P - P P P P
MSFT P - P P P - P P P
Sun P - P P P P P - P
Systinet F - P F P P P F -

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Scenario 6

WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P - P P P P F
BeTrusted P - - - ? ? P P F
Hitatchi P - P - - P P P P
MSFT P - P - P - P P P
Sun P - P - P P P - F
Systinet F - F - P P P F -

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Scenario 7

WSS4J BEA BeTrusted CG Hitachi MSFT Sarvega Sun
Systinet
WSS4J - - P - P P P F F
BeTrusted P -` - - ? ? ? P ?
Hitatchi P - P - - P P P F
MSFT P - P - P - P P F
Sun P - P - P P F - F
Systinet F - F - F F P F -

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup
.php.




To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php
.


(See attached file: graycol.gif)(See attached file: pic18673.gif)(See attached file: ecblank.gif)

graycol.gif

pic18673.gif

ecblank.gif