Subject: RE: [wss] Issue 312 proposed resolution
Ron Your message confused me. Are you saying the token type table can be extended with additional types or that the entry should be x509 instead of x509v3, or are you saying the token type should not delineate between x509 versions? My point was that the x509 token type entry should be consistent with the rest of the profile that refers to x509v3 so that the current profile is internally consistent, thus suggested changing the table entry so it is consistent. Thanks Regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia -----Original Message----- From: ext Ron Monzillo [mailto:Ronald.Monzillo@sun.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 11:52 AM To: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-TP/Boston) Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com Subject: Re: [wss] Issue 312 proposed resolution Frederick, IN our resolution to issue 293, we decided to limit the degree to which the X509 profile was confined to v3 certicates. The line you cite was once likely in error. However, going forward, we should be removing such qualifications. Ron Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote: >Dana > > > <snip> > >I also note a typo in the X.509 token profile, x509 should be x509v3 in >the table at line 187. > >Thanks > >Regards, Frederick > >Frederick Hirsch >Nokia > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup .php.