RE: [wss] Issue 312 proposed resolution

[<Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>]

Ron

Your message confused me. Are you saying the token type table can be
extended with additional types or that the entry should be x509 instead
of x509v3, or are you saying the token type should not delineate between
x509 versions?

My point was that the x509 token type entry should be consistent with
the rest of the profile that refers to x509v3 so that the current
profile is internally consistent, thus suggested changing the table
entry so it is consistent.

Thanks

Regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Ron Monzillo [mailto:Ronald.Monzillo@sun.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 11:52 AM
To: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-TP/Boston)
Cc: dkaufman@forumsys.com; wss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wss] Issue 312 proposed resolution

Frederick,

IN our resolution to issue 293, we decided to limit the degree to which
the X509 profile was confined to v3 certicates.

The line you cite was once likely in error. However, going forward, we
should be removing such qualifications.

Ron

Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote:

>Dana
>
>  
>
<snip>

>
>I also note a typo in the X.509 token profile, x509 should be x509v3 in

>the table at line 187.
>
>Thanks
>
>Regards, Frederick
>
>Frederick Hirsch
>Nokia
>  
>



To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup
.php.