Re: Clarification request: Re: Formal submission from WSS TC forOASIS final standardization process

["Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>]

OK, thanks. I will proceed on the assumption that this is a single 
submission.

-Karl



Kelvin Lawrence wrote:
> 
> Karl, I believe it was the intent of the TC that these profiles be 
> considered as a whole. I would describe them as "Additional token 
> profiles for the WS-Security 2004 OASIS Standard"
> 
> Others feel free to comment but I believe that was the way the TC voted 
> to proceed.
> 
> Cheers
> Kelvin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
> 
> 10/15/2004 09:03 AM
> Please respond to
> karl.best@oasis-open.org
> 
> 
> To
> Kelvin Lawrence/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> cc
> James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>, 
> mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org, ckaler@microsoft.com, wss@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject
> Clarification request: Re: Formal submission from WSS TC for OASIS final 
> standardization process
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kelvin, Chris:
> 
> Is this submission for the purpose of approving a single OASIS Standard,
> or two?
> 
> And, if a single OS (composed of two spec files), what is its name?
> 
> Or, if two, would you please break this up and make two separate
> submissions?
> 
> -Karl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kelvin Lawrence wrote:
>  >
>  > Dear Karl,  here is the final version of the formal submission paperwork
>  > for the SAML and REL Token Profiles from the WSS TC. We hope  everything
>  > below meets with your approval. Please let us know if there is anything
>  > else that we need to provide. Please let us know what numbers you assign
>  > to the documents so that we may rename the files in accordance with
>  > OASIS naming guidelines. Thanks.
>  >
>  > Respectfully submitted by
>  > Kelvin Lawrence & Chris Kaler
>  > WSS TC Co-Chairs
>  > October 14th 2004
>  >
>  > 1.        A formal specification that is a valid member of its type,
>  > together with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of
>  > which must be written using approved OASIS templates;
>  >
>  > The documents being submitted are in the document repository as follows:
>  >
>  > SAML Token profile: [1]
>  > REL Token profile: [2]
>  >
>  > [1]
>  > 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/9347/wss-saml-token-profile-1.0-cd-03.pdf
>  > [2]
>  > 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/9381/oasis-____-wss-REL-token-profile-1.0-draft09-cd.pdf 
> 
>  >
>  >
>  > 2.        A clear English-language summary of the specification;
>  > The two documents are token profiles of WS-Security that show how to use
>  > the core WS-Security 2004 specification in conjunction with SAML and
>  > rights expression languages (REL).
>  >
>  > 3.        A statement regarding the relationship of this specification
>  > to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing
>  > organizations;
>  > These documents are further profiles of WS-Security. They relate to the
>  > work of the WSS TC and also to the work of the SSTC (for SAML).
>  >
>  > 4.        Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations
>  > that they are successfully using the specification consistently with the
>  > OASIS IPR Policy;
>  >
>  > For the SAML Token Profile
>  > 1.  Westbridge Technology
>  > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00016.html
>  > 2. Sun Microsystems
>  > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00015.html
>  > 3. Oracle http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00017.html
>  > 4. BEA http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00023.html
>  > 5. Microsoft: 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00026.html
>  >
>  > For the REL Token Profile
>  > 1. ContentGuard
>  > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00021.html
>  > 2. IBM http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00022.html
>  > 3. Microsoft: 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00025.html
>  >
>  > 5.        An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the
>  > public review period, along with its resolution;
>  > No substantive comments were received during the public review period.
>  > Therefore, no actions were necessary
>  >
>  > 6.        An account of and results of the voting to approve the approve
>  > the specification as a Committee Draft;
>  > The voting took place at the WSS TC telecon on 21st September 2004. The
>  > vote was unanimous.
>  > The minutes for that meeting are located at the URL below
>  > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200409/msg00081.html
>  >
>  > 7.        An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any
>  > earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification,
>  > together with the originating TC's response to each comment;
>  > This is the first attempt to standardize these documents
>  >
>  > 8.        A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the
>  > originating TC;
>  > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss-comment/
>  >
>  > 9.        A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all
>  > members of the TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR
>  > Policy; and
>  > Members have been provided with a pointer to the policy on multiple
>  > occaisions. A reminder e-mail was sent on 11-Oct 2004
>  >
>  > 10.        Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by
>  > one or more TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the
>  > Committee Draft, or certification by the chair that no minority reports
>  > exist.
>  > No minority reports have been received. None are expected.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Cheers
>  > Kelvin
>  >
> 
> 
>