xacml message

Subject: RE: Policies with No Subject

From: Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com>
To: 'Tim Moses' <tim.moses@entrust.com>, xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:54:42 -0400

 
> (His third paragraph does contain an implicit definition of 
> the term "privilege" which conflicts with my use of the term. 
>  But, that is not material to this discussion.)

Funny you should mention that. I just noticed that RFC 2828 considers
"privilege", "authorization" and "permission" to essentially be synonyms,
which is consistent with my usage.

Hal

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Policies with No Subject
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>