RE: [xacml] Alternative to Michiharu's proposal. (fwd)

[Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>]

I usually say ex eh see em el. So I'd have to go with "an". :)

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Hal Lockhart wrote:

> It depends on whether you say "an ex-ack-mal" or "a zack-mal" I agree with
> "an".
>
> Hal
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Polar Humenn [mailto:polar@syr.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:21 AM
> > To: bill parducci
> > Cc: XACML
> > Subject: Re: [xacml] Alternative to Michiharu's proposal. (fwd)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, bill parducci wrote:
> >
> > > you only need to choose between 'a XACML' and 'an XACML', other than
> > > that i can live with it. :o)
> >
> > Looks like by voting, the "an"s have it.
> >
> > >
> > > b
> > >
> > > Polar Humenn wrote:
> > > > Opps, I noticed a couple nuances when it came back to me
> > as well. I'm done
> > > > for the day. A rewording based on Bill's suggestions:
> > > >
> > > > 7.1 Use Profile for XACML Request
> > > >
> > > ! This section describes the use profile for using an XACML
> > PDP in an
> > > > application environment. This use profile covers the case
> > of a PEP that is
> > > > configured to make authorization queries to a single PDP.
> > PEP to multiple
> > > > PDP configurations are outside of the scope of this specification.
> > > >
> > > > An application functions in the role of the PEP if it
> > guards access to a
> > > > particular resource and asks the PDP for an access
> > decision. The PEP that
> > > > asks the PDP for an access decision SHALL abide by the
> > result of that
> > > > access decision in the following way:
> > > >
> > > > A PEP SHALL allow access to the particular resource ONLY
> > IF a valid XACML
> > > > response of "Permit" is returned by the PDP. The PEP
> > SHALL deny access to
> > > ! the particular resource in all other cases. An XACML
> > response of "Permit"
> > > > SHALL be considered valid ONLY IF the PEP understands all of the
> > > > obligations that may be contained in the response.
> > > >
> > > > A PEP that receives a valid XACML response of "Permit"
> > with obligations
> > > > SHALL be responsible for fulfilling all of those
> > obligations. A PEP that
> > > ! receives a XACML response of "Deny" with obligations
> > SHALL be responsible
> > > > for fulfilling all of the obligations that it understands.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >  Did I mess anything up?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > -Polar
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> > >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> >
>