Re: [xacml] Attesting implementations and <type>-map,Match arg order issues

[Seth Proctor <seth.proctor@sun.com>]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 06:13:48PM -0500, Anne Anderson wrote:
> This mail is addressed to implementors of potential "attesting
> implementations" (any others, please speak up!).
> [...] 
> If you are an attesting implementation, would you be able to
> adapt your implementation by December 12 if the TC decides to
> make these changes on:

I will have no trouble with either issue in any timeline.


seth