[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Attesting implementations and <type>-map,Match arg order issues
Seth, Anne said that you had to do an "ugly" hack inorder to implement "map" as opposed to <type>-map? Could you explain what that is and why you feel it's ugly? Thanks, -Polar On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Seth Proctor wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 06:13:48PM -0500, Anne Anderson wrote: > > This mail is addressed to implementors of potential "attesting > > implementations" (any others, please speak up!). > > [...] > > If you are an attesting implementation, would you be able to > > adapt your implementation by December 12 if the TC decides to > > make these changes on: > > I will have no trouble with either issue in any timeline. > > > seth > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC