Re: [xacml] Attesting implementations and <type>-map,Match arg order issues

[Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>]

Seth,

Anne said that you had to do an "ugly" hack inorder to implement "map" as
opposed to <type>-map?

Could you explain what that is and why you feel it's ugly?

Thanks,
-Polar

On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Seth Proctor wrote:

>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 06:13:48PM -0500, Anne Anderson wrote:
> > This mail is addressed to implementors of potential "attesting
> > implementations" (any others, please speak up!).
> > [...]
> > If you are an attesting implementation, would you be able to
> > adapt your implementation by December 12 if the TC decides to
> > make these changes on:
>
> I will have no trouble with either issue in any timeline.
>
>
> seth
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>