[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Specification number...
I would call the specification 1.0 when it finally gets accepted by OASIS as a standard. We are really wreslting with the version of the document, not the standard. I like Bill's idea, of XACML 1.0, Document Version 0.1, 0.2, etc, label the document 1.0 when its finally accepted. -Polar On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Carlisle Adams wrote: > Hi all, > > On today's call we decided to change the number of the new Committee Spec. > to 1.1 (since the version we approved prior to the start of the comment > period was 1.0). However, in several places in the spec we refer to "XACML > v1.0", and all of our names (URIs) have "1.0" in them. Ultimately, if we > get to OASIS Standard, I assume that standard will be numbered 1.0. This > all seems potentially confusing. > > Would it be any better to call this Committee Specification version 1.01, or > 1.0a, or 1.0.1? Any other suggestions or comments? > > Please respond as soon as possible; I'd like to get the final version out > today. > > Carlisle. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC