[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] WS-Policy and XACML comparison
"Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com> wrote: >Somehow you have mistaken item [6] as WS--Policy requirements, whereas >these are Tim's views and NOT requirements that drove WS-Policy, so I can >see how you came to your conclusion ! Tony, I merely referenced Tim's document as one statement of requirements. As far as I know, there is no published Requirements Specification for WS-Policy, and that agreeing on the requirements is one of the first tasks ahead of the group working on WS-Policy. By the way, two of IBM's contributions to XACML may be very valuable in addressing WS-Policy requirements: a) Obligations: there may be an obligation on the service requester associated with application of a particular policy, although this obligation is transparent to the service provider. b) Hierarchical resources Anne ------ Anne Anderson Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories Burlington, MA 781-442-0928
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC