Re: [xacml] future feature idea

[Seth Proctor <Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM>]

> my assumption has always been that version is at
least implied in 
> the 
> naming of the referenced resource

True, that's the way a lot of systems work, but it
has a couple problems. For one thing, it's a
system-specific mechanism, and for another it
doesn't let you specify ranges or bounds on usable
versions. On the other hand, it's certainly easier
to deal with.

Anway, like I said, this is just something to mull
over for a while. I think it could be very useful on
the management side of things, and I've talked with
a few people who seemed positive on the idea.
Something to think about in the future, but not
necisarily a "must have."


seth