Re: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL

[bill parducci <bill.parducci@overxeer.com>]

i disagree. should we abandon SAML profiling as well? ignore the OGSA 
input? standards are worthless sans applicability.  to that end we are 
not going to be able to develop a tenable standard without holding it up 
to practical application. demonstrating how WSPL can be mapped onto 
XACML seems like the perfect opportunity to just that.

not sure what you mean by 'going on and on' but i for one don't expect 
the group to solve policy expression for eternity in the next version. 
viable standards are *living* documents; this group should continue 
improving the specification so long as there is a well defined need for 
such and sufficient community interest to justify it.

b

Anthony Nadalin wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Bill, this reinforces why WSPL is our of scope,  As you write  "If you are
> writing polices for WSPL that are expressed in XACML", so the emphasis is
> writing WSPL not XACML. I realize that some TCs want to go on and on and
> never end but hopefully this is not one of those.
> Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
>