[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: work item 46
Work item 46 covers the element that's included as StatusDetail when you have a status code of missing-attribute. The spec says to use Attribute with no AttributeValue to specify a specific missing attribute but no specific required value. The problem is that this isn't schema valid. After thinking about this, rather than introduce a new element somewhere that is used only in this case to report missing attributes, I'd like to suggest that we keep the current text, and simply clarify that ommitting the AttributeValue isn't schema valid, but is the right approach in this case. I think this will cause less confusion than introducing a new, special-purpose element, and I don't think that anyone will really be schema-validating specific elements in StatusDetail anyway. Does this sound reasonable? seth
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]