OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xacml message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xacml] Summary of issues: WI#10. Parameters for Combining Algorithms



Why can not we reuse Obligations (or better call it decision attributes)
as the output parameters?
It seems as an over complication for me to add a parallel way to
transport values associated with the decision just for the combining
algorithm purposes.


-----Original Message-----
From: Polar Humenn [mailto:polar@syr.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:50 PM
To: Seth Proctor
Cc: Anne Anderson; XACML TC
Subject: Re: [xacml] Summary of issues: WI#10. Parameters for Combining
Algorithms

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Polar Humenn wrote:

> > Using an expression defeats this (ie, if I use a designator, I'll
never
> > know just by looking at the policy what parameters are being
supplied).
> > Could someone provide a clear example that shows why we _need_
> > expressions instead of concrete values?
>
> Aside from you get it for free, so why not use it. You may want to
> reference a value you've defined else where.

For instance, you may want to calculate a value
based on attributes in the request context.

A bit contrived, let's say the way you combine the rules depends upon
the
age difference between the potential bride and the groom. If the age
difference is below -10, you want to perform a deny overrides on the
rules, between -2 and 3, use a majority of Permits over Denies, and more
than 10, a permit overrides.

Cheers,
-Polar

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgro
up.php.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]