[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [Re: [xacml] obligations & error conditions] - PROPOSAL
based on these two points alone (PEPs making decisions/PEP modifying decisions on the fly) i fear that we are getting further way from agreement rather than closer. i think that this is going to have to be worked out on a white board at the f2f unless you can come up with a succinct proposal for modifications to the spec before then. either way, i can feel our discussion circling and that tells me that we need to get the rest of the TC to take a look at this ;o) b +++ Polar Humenn wrote: > Now, you are getting it. The PEP is free to make that access control > decision. [...] > I said that I am fine with that interpretation, if it needs to be there. > The PEP can consider it an Error, (Indeterminate), and take steps to > either make an outright decision (of Permit or Deny), or take alternative > action.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]