[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] XACML names
I recommend grandfathering. If we were starting a new draft, I would say consider the new naming format, but we (you) have a lot of work invested in our current draft, and I don't think it helps clarity or anything else to change the names just to fit the new naming guidelines. Anne On 17 May, Tim Moses writes: [xacml] XACML names > From: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com> > To: 'XACML' <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org> > Subject: [xacml] XACML names > Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:37:51 -0400 > > Colleagues - I am looking at XACML names in light of the OASIS naming > guidelines. > > For instances, the schema namespace should change from > > urn:oasis:xacml:2.0:policy:schema:os > > to > > urn:oasis:xacml:policy:schema:2.0:os > > Similar changes would be required to the function, attribute and data-type > identifiers. > > These changes seem rather radical. Perhaps, we should invoke the > "grandfather" clause, and stick to our existing naming scheme. What do > people think? > > All the best. Tim. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Moses > 613.270.3183 > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php. > -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]