[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present
Seth - That's pretty much what I thought. So, I'll remove it. All the best. Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Proctor [mailto:Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 4:44 PM To: Tim Moses Cc: 'XACML' Subject: Re: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:18, Tim Moses wrote: > Colleagues - We list the function > "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present" as "mandatory" in the > conformance section. But, I can't see a definition for it. Can > anyone explain? All the best. Tim. Late into the 1.0 work there was a present function for determining if a value was present, but the semantics got too confused so we trashed it and instead created the MustBePresent attribute on Designators and Selectors. I suspect it's just a mistake that the attribute was left in. I suggest it should be removed. seth
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]