Re: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present

[Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>]

I don't think we trashed that function. Did we? What was confusing about
it? I don't recall. -Polar

(won't make the confernce call today. I'm a the OMG meeting.

-Polar

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Seth Proctor wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:18, Tim Moses wrote:
> > Colleagues - We list the function
> > "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present" as "mandatory" in the
> > conformance section.  But, I can't see a definition for it.  Can anyone
> > explain?  All the best.  Tim.
>
> Late into the 1.0 work there was a present function for determining if a
> value was present, but the semantics got too confused so we trashed it
> and instead created the MustBePresent attribute on Designators and
> Selectors. I suspect it's just a mistake that the attribute was left in.
> I suggest it should be removed.
>
>
> seth
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>