Subject: RE: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function
Seth - But ... Target can contain a match function, e.g. ResourceMatch, which compares an attributeValue with a ResourceAttributeDesignator, which is a bag of base types. No? All the best. Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Proctor [mailto:Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM] Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:17 AM To: Tim Moses Cc: 'XACML' Subject: Re: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 09:16, Tim Moses wrote: > Colleagues - Section 7.5 lists the xacml functions that qualify as a > match function. I believe type-is-in has the necessary qualifications > and should be included in the list. Any thoughts? All the best. > Tim. The type-is-in functions cannot be used in a Target's MatchId, since you're not evaluating over a bag, but between two base types. In fact, none of the bag functions may be used in a Target match. seth To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.p hp.