Re: [xacml] 2.0 draft 13 comments

[Bill Parducci <bparducci@gluecode.com>]

Polar Humenn wrote:

> Comments (on comments) in line. I only kept what I commented on, and left
> out others that I have no comments on.
> 
> 
>>Section 5.20: The last sentence ("* represents any sequence of digits of
>>length zero or more") should be removed, as it is inaccurate. Also, this
>>section might be better placed near the start of section 5, so it's in
>>correct descent order, like the rest of the elements described in this
>>section, but I don't think that's too critical.
> 
> 
> I just think it needs to be reworded, not removed.
> 
> The expression "(\d+\.)*" means a zero or more length sequence of the
> expression contained within the parentheses, which is a sequence of one
> or more digits then followed by a dot.

personally, i *still* think it should refer to a regular expression 
reference and be done with it ;o)

we shouldn't be creating our own matching language.

b