RE: [xacml] 2.0 draft 13 comments

["Daniel Engovatov" <dengovatov@bea.com>]

>personally, i *still* think it should refer to a regular expression 
>reference and be done with it ;o)

>we shouldn't be creating our own matching language.

Second that - very emphatically. :)    Enough troubles with existing
languages and their bugs and quirks.

Daniel;