[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Updating XACML 2.0 conformance tests to meet errata
|
Hi All, A couple of meetings ago I agreed to take an action item to "straighten out" where things stand w the conformance tests and recommend action: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200805/msg00007.html I have reviewed the situation and here are my preliminary findings: 1. the most recent collection of conformance tests was dated 10-Oct-05 and are located in this zip file submitted by Argyn Kuketayev: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/14846/xacml2.0-ct-v.0.4.zip This zip file contains a thousand plus .xml files plus an overall description file named ConformanceTests.html 2. just 3 days later (13-Oct-05), Argyn submitted another batch of tests that were suggested for section F of ConformanceTests.html. These were single submissions to the repository http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/14877/ConformanceTests.html These files were put on a wiki page as indicated in this email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200510/msg00015.html 3. on 18-Apr-06, Argyn submitted a zip file containing the single files in item 2 above with the following cover email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200604/msg00009.html the zip file is: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17732/2006-04-16-conformance2.0-patch.zip 4. Craig Forster submitted the email I am replying to here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200805/msg00000.html which has an attached zip file containing Craig's changes: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200805/bin00000.bin 5. there was considerable discussion about Oleg's initial email on the conformance tests: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-dev/200804/msg00001.html during April and May of 2008 in xacml-dev: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-dev/ however, aside from some errata to the core doc, I do not believe those discussions resulted in any changes proposed for the tests themselves. Suggested course of action: 1. we should review Argyn's changes in 2 and 3 above and decide if they should be added to section F of ConformanceTests.html as he did in the above ref'd link. 2. we should replace the files in the xacml2.0-ct-v.0.4.zip file with Craig's fixes and update that file to be named: xacml2.0-ct-v.0.5.zip 3. we should also update the ConformanceTests.html file to include the changes from the above 2 items. 4. I think the wiki that Argyn left should be regarded as an artifact that we may or may not want to continue to use. Thanks, Rich Craig Forster wrote: Hi all, I've gone ahead and updated the conformance tests for the dayTimeDuration and yearMonthDuration DataType changes ONLY. The attached .ziparchive file includes only the files that have changed. (See attached file: conformance-updates.ziparchive) Here is a list of the changed files: conformance/policy/IIC102Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC103Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC104Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC105Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC106Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC107Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC150Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC151Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC152Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC153Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC154Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC155Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC156Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC157Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC231Policy.xml conformance/policy/IIC232Policy.xml conformance/request/IIC150Request.xml conformance/request/IIC151Request.xml conformance/request/IIC152Request.xml conformance/request/IIC153Request.xml conformance/request/IIC154Request.xml conformance/request/IIC155Request.xml conformance/request/IIC156Request.xml conformance/request/IIC157Request.xml conformance/request/IIC231Request.xml conformance/request/IIC232Request.xml Regards, Craig --------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Forster Software Engineer IBM Australia Development Labs Argus == https://w3.webahead.ibm.com/w3ki/display/commonauthz/Home Blog == http://blogs.tap.ibm.com/weblogs/craigforster/ --------------------------------------------------------------- From: Craig Forster/Australia/IBM@IBMAU To: XACML TC <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: 01/05/2008 09:58 Subject: [xacml] Updating XACML 2.0 conformance tests to meet errata Hi all, Are there any plans to update the XACML 2.0 conformance test suite to meet the errata? The primary issue that I'm seeing is the change of the dayTimeDuration and yearMonthDuration DataType URIs, for example from "http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xquery-operators-20020816#dayTimeDuration" to "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:data-type:dayTimeDuration". These URI changes cause 16 of the conformance tests to fail. If the TC approves, I'm more than happy to update the conformance tests myself. Regards, Craig --------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Forster Software Engineer IBM Australia Development Labs Argus == https://w3.webahead.ibm.com/w3ki/display/commonauthz/Home Blog == http://blogs.tap.ibm.com/weblogs/craigforster/ --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]