Subject: minutes 23 January 2009 TC meeting
1. Roll Call Hal Lockhart (Chair) Bill Parducci (Co-Chair, minutes) Erik Rissanen Anthony Nadalin Rich Levinson Darran Rolls Seth Proctor John Tolbert Anil Saldhana Voting Members: 8 of 11 (72%) (used for quorum calculation) 2. Administrivia The TC discussed a clarification on the minutes from the 15 January TC meeting. The minutes will be updated to clarify the text. A vote upon the minutes has been deferred to next week. 3. Issues Hierarchical Profile Rich will present the results of his analysis on the Profile on the list. Multiple Decision Hal reviewed the current proposal and discussion on the list. There is general consensus in the TC in support of the proposal. Hal will develop the respective schema and text to complete the proposal, beginning with a summary to the list. There is still some discussion on how correlation will be dealt with on the response. There was clarification that the syntax will be described in the Core Schema and the semantics ("boxcaring", etc.) in the Profile text. Combining Algorithms Tony voiced concern that the old algorithms not removed. There is general consensus that both existing and new combining algorithms will be mandatory. The TC will likely add text indicating a preference in favor of the new algorithms, but all shall remain valid in v3.0. RBAC Profile Darran asked about the state of the RBAC Profile with respect to V3. He also reviewed use cases he believes may be pertinent to this Profile. Darran volunteered to create a proposal to address these cases within the Profile. XSPA (Comment List) There was a comment on the list that some of the links in the XSPA Profile that pointed to a private list. Since the references are directed at HL7 specification content but link to the TC Demo list. Hal suggested that there is a better source for this reference. Schema Checking (Comment List) Hal reviewed a thread from the Comment list that discussed the role of schema checking. Schema validity is necessary to be a valid Policy, but Seth pointed out that how it is done is an implementation choice. meeting adjourned.