[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: IPC WD-07 feedback
In response to your comments:
1.) I will fix typo.
2.) I'm not sure what’s being requested here. Can I get some clarification or was this just a comment for discussion?
3.) Since the DataType of this attribute is http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date the ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats format allows granularity down to the second. I believe we’re ok here.
4.) I will add your text suggestion to the description of the Encrypt Obligation.
If there are no other comments by the end of the week I will update the IPC with 1 & 4 above and upload by early next week.
Richard C. Hill
The Boeing Company
1. Typo on line 192: “fo” -> “of”
2. In Sections 2.1.10 Effective-Date and 2.1.11 Expiration-Date it’s unclear whether the given date values are inclusive or exclusive to the agreement or resource lifetime.
3. As Date types, Effective-Date and Expiration-Date cannot represent agreements or resources that have a valid lifetime less than one full day, or that start or end at specific times of day. Example: license to (re)broadcast protected content at a public event only during a specific 2 hour window of time.
4. Section 2.3.1 Encrypt doesn’t state what the PEP is required to do when it receives an Encrypt obligation.
Product Architect | | Quest Software - Now including the people and products of BiTKOO | www.quest.com