[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xcbf] Tuesday, 11 March 2003 Ballot
Alessandro. I posted notice of the ballot starting to the list, so that everyone knew that the ballot had started. Before this, I posted several notices, starting as early as last December of the process that would be followed to try to progress our work. After over a week of no response, I sent you at least one email reminding you of the ballot and asking that you vote. Five days ago, you wrote me and told me to expect your vote the next day. I trust that you have looked into the new web pages for the XCBF group. I will attempt in the next ballot to use the automated balloting process. This will make it easier to manage the ballot and to record votes. Phil Alessandro Triglia wrote: >Phil, > >When did this ballot start? When was the duration of the ballot >announced? The earliest email I find about it is your email of March >11, but this email didn't mention the duration of the ballot. Was I >expected to understand it would be two weeks? > >Alessandro > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Phillip H. Griffin [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 16:28 >>To: [OASIS XCBF] >>Subject: [xcbf] Tuesday, 11 March 2003 Ballot >> >> >>The ballot to accept the proposed changes to the XCBF >>document to address public review comments and create a new >>XCBF Committee Specification 1.0 has passed, with the >>following members voting: >> >>Approve: >>Aerts, Boon, Day, Gérôme, Griffin, Larmouth, Martin, Thorpe >> >>Disapprove: >>None. >> >>Abstain: >>None. >> >>Eligible but not voting are: Aichelen, Scott, Thompson, Triglia. >> >>Members are cautioned that failure to return mail ballots can >>lead to termination of TC membership, as described in the >>OASIS procedures at >>http://www.oasis-> open.org/committees/process.php#termination. >> >> >>I will post >>the new CS 1.0 document to the list shortly and notify OASIS >>of this event. >> >>My understanding from comments received during the ballot is >>that Day, Larmouth and Thorpe oppose submitting the CS to >>OASIS for consideration as an OASIS standard. But I will soon >>submit this issue for ballot so that the sense of the TC is clear. >> >>Phil Griffin >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]