OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xdi message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xdi] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-02-26


Oops - my mistake - I sent XRI TC minutes to the XDI TC list. Names are too
close ;-)

=Drummond 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 1:00 AM
> To: 'OASIS - XDI TC'
> Subject: [xdi] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-02-26
> 
> Following are the minutes of the unofficial telecon of the XRI TC at:
> 
> Date:  Thursday, 26 February 2009 USA
> Time:  2:00PM - 3:00PM Pacific Time (22:00-23:00 UTC)
> 
> ATTENDING
> 
> Markus Sabadello
> John Bradley
> Drummond Reed
> Wil Norris
> Peter Davis
> Nick Nicholas
> Eran Hammer-Lahav
> 
> 
> 1) XRD 1.0 - HOST META
> 
> Eran said he is still awaiting feedback. He and Mark Nottingham have also
> published a new draft of the Link Header spec.
> 
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-site-meta-01.txt
> 
> # ERAN to send to the list a link to the new Link Header specification
> draft
> as well.
> 
> # ALL - review and post feedback to the list.
> 
> 
> 2) XRD 1.0 - HTTP DISCOVERY (LRDD)
> 
> This too is still awaiting feedback. Eran noted that this spec is very
> light, with the key idea being that this doesn't have to be repeated in
> XRD
> 1.0.
> 
> 	http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hammer-discovery-02.txt
> 
> # ALL - review and post feedback to the list.
> 
> 
> 3) XRD 1.0 - DNS DISCOVERY
> 
> Peter reported that what is current posted is currently stable. We
> discussed
> what form it might take if we publish it. For consistency sake, it should
> probably be IETF.
> 
> Eran asked if Peter had looked at the DNS SD (Service Discovery) protocol
> from Apple. Eran noted that Apple's Bonjour service is using it.
> 
> # PETER to look at DNS SD to see how it compares.
> 
> 
> 4) XRD 1.0 - SCHEMA
> 
> 	http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XrdOne/XrdSchema
> 
> The first topic was Service Provider XRDs - see the message from Peter:
> 
> 	http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xri/200902/msg00081.html
> 
> # ERAN to post an example of what an XRD for a service provider (such as
> an
> OpenID provider) would look like.
> 
> The second topic was the second open issue listed at:
> 
> 
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XrdOne/XrdSchema#head-
> 629e0d1ff37011673f67765
> 57df3de8f563061d9
> 
> The concensus was that <Link> element would not have <ResourceType>, only
> <Rel>. At the XRD level, <SubjectType> will become just <Type>.
> 
> # DRUMMOND to update the wiki.
> 
> The third topic was the third open issue listed at the link above, i.e.,
> the
> question of having a <Subject> at the <Link> level. There was consensus
> that
> this will be needed for trust purposes. However Eran would prefer that it
> have a different element name at the link level.
> 
> We agreed we need a few use cases and examples before settling on
> semantics
> for this element.
> 
> John then brought up the question about using XRIs as <Subject> values.
> The
> core issue is whether such XRIs should be bound into absolute URIs as
> described at http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri, or whether
> they should be left as relative URIs. The three choices are:
> 
> a) Absolute URIs, any binding for XRIs
> 
> b) Absolute URIs, one canonical binding for XRIs (http://xri.net/)
> 
> c) Absolute or relative URIs, all XRIs appear as relative URIs but
> absolute
> XRIs.
> 
> The trust model may have a bearing on which of these is the best option.
> This also raised the question of how XRI proxy servers can pass on
> signature
> verification. It appeared the XRI-to-URI binding would have to be to the
> base URI for the authority for the final XRD.
> 
> # JOHN to cook on this issue and propose a solution to the list.
> 
> 
> 5) XRD 1.0 - TRUST TEAM
> 
> No report - neither Brian or Nat could attend the call.
> 
> 
> 6) XRI 3.0 - SYNTAX AND BINDINGS UPDATE
> 
> Drummond reported no progress due to day job load. It will be at least two
> more weeks.
> 
> 
> 7) XRI 3.0 - MAILTO BINDING PROPOSAL
> 
> 	http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriThree/EmailBinding
> 
> We ran out of time to review this - we will put it on next week's call.
> 
> 
> 8) NEXT CALL
> 
> Thursday 3/5 2-3PM PT (22:00-23:00 UTC).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]