[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xdi] XDI collection as attribute
In https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/XdiAbnf (and the discussion page Drummond linked) authorities and generals must be entities and cannot be attributes. Types (either singleton or collection) may be either entity or attribute. Not sure I understand Hubert’s question as authority singletons or collections cannot be attributes at all if the ABNF is correct. Drummond, please let me know if this is in error. In https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/XdiAbnf/Discussion the top section Drummond just added is the latest statement-level and path-level ABNF draft, but doesn’t give arc-level ABNF. The 2013-05-05 section below is not the latest arc-level ABNF; https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/XdiAbnf is newer, the spec draft is newer than that, and the spec draft in turn may not have some latest changes; also, we may not need the syntax abstractions to support both Display and JSON Flat serializations in a common ABNF if that is no longer possible after notation shift. On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:05 PM, =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@xdi.org> wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]