[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xliff] FW: XLIFF <bin-unit> question
Let's leave the XLIFF spec as it is then, since we already reference the MIME spec already. I'll put forth the ballot immediately. Regrards, Tony Yves Savourel wrote: >We would say something like: "The byte order in the block of MIME data follow the rule defined by the MIME specification." But on second thought, maybe we don't need to specify anything: since we refer to MIME's specification already. There is no reasons to make endianess a specific case. >Either way is fine with me. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: TONY.JEWTUSHENKO@ORACLE.COM [mailto:TONY.JEWTUSHENKO@ORACLE.COM] >Sent: Wed, May 14, 2003 11:20 AM >To: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: RE: [xliff] FW: XLIFF <bin-unit> question > > >Yves and all: > >I assume that a revision to the spec with this note inserted into a revised spec we will not require a review iteration before voting on it. If anyone disagrees, please raise a flag. Otherwise, as soon as Yves posts the revised spec I'll immediately set up the ballot. > >Feel free to object. > >Regards, >Tony > > > > -- Tony Jewtushenko mailto:tony.jewtushenko@oracle.com Principal Product Manager direct tel: +353.1.8039080 ST Tools Technology Team Oracle Corporation, Ireland
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]