[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: XLIFF 1.2 Representation Guides
|
Hi Bryan, These documents were not part of the OASIS Standard, but
supplementary information; their current status is Committee Draft. They have
not been approved as Committee Specifications or OASIS Standard. We were
talking about these in the context of “informational documents” in
hopes that the new track would be incorporated into the TC Process sooner,
rather than later. The good news is that it appears that we will have an informational
track late summer; if these documents are to be updated as part of 2.0 they can
then be appropriate identified as such. Regards, Mary CS ballot: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=1338 OS Submission ballot: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=1392 OS ballot announcement: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200801/msg00000.html From:
bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com] Hi
Mary, Rodolfo
noticed that the representation guides the TC passed, and submitted as part of
the XLIFF 1.2 OASIS Standard ballot are still listed as Committee Draft. http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/xliff-profile-html/xliff-profile-html-1.2-cd02.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/xliff-profile-java/xliff-profile-java-v1.2-cd02.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/xliff-profile-po/xliff-profile-po-1.2-cd02.html I
know (I think) it is required that the TC Administrator is the only one
who can change the URL to the core (officially passed) level (http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core).
But we're unclear about the "Committee Draft 02" label the guides all
currently carry. Should this be upgraded? If so, do you do it, or
does Rodolfo? We
are happy to do what it takes to get the guides in proper form. Thanks, Bryan |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]