[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] RE: Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup" - Proposal for Next Steps
Hi Asgeir, Thanks for your efforts. Your input confirms my feeling that the topic is of importance. Thus, I am looking forward to the next step - from my understanding this could be agreement on the time boxing approach I suggested (that is: agreeing on milestones, and setting ourselves deadlines for them). Cheers, Christian -----Original Message----- From: Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:asgeirf@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:38 AM To: bryan s schnabel Cc: Lieske, Christian; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] RE: Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup" - Proposal for Next Steps Hi Christian, all, I have re-written the first section on the wiki-page relating to the 'General Scope' of the inline-content model, in a way that might be more productive to the TC discussion tomorrow. http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/OneContentModel/Requirements In Section 3.1. I have re-phrased a lot of the content as questions. Perhaps we can go through these in the meeting in order to arrive at a common scope for this specification. As we go through the points, we can add the agreed scope to Section 3.2. I tried to include all of Christian's initial bullet-points in the list of questions, but feel free to edit the wiki adding any additional aspects we need to take into consideration when defining the scope. cheers, asgeir ----- "bryan s schnabel" <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > We touched on your proposal a bit in our last meeting. But delayed the > full discussion until a time when you could attend. Related to your > idea about a very structured approach, we did all agree that it was > best to revert back to a requirements gathering phase before we even > begin to think about the state as it exists currently in XLIFF and > TMX, or specific ideas for going forward. > > And regarding you thoughts about "direct changes to the Wiki" vs. > "e-mail thread first," we began that discussion. I'm not sure we > established a universal approach to have a useful, up-to-date, yet > in-control wiki. But we did agree that it will be okay to add > comments the wiki, as long as each comment has a name and date > associated with it. > > Thanks for the very useful proposal. We can certainly discuss it > further at the next meeting. > > Thanks, > > Bryan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lieske, Christian [mailto:christian.lieske@sap.com] > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:22 PM > To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [xliff] Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup" - > Proposal for Next Steps > > > Hi there, > > I have just browsed the e-mail traffic of the last days. I saw > sub-topics such as > > - TMX 2.0 does not have an inline element to store content? > - XLIFF 2.0 in 3D (Testing the friendship between XLIFF and TMX) > - Opinion: importance of preserving XML markup and nodes > - Opinion: Need or not for SUB > > In addition, I re-read the thread around the question how to maintain > the Wiki > page. > > Both threads made me wonder if we would benefit from a very structured > (for example time-boxed) approach > for continuing our work on the "Generic Inline Markup". > > Accordingly, I would like to propose something along the following how > lines: > > Calendar Week 17: "General Scope" discussion > Calendar Week 18: "General Scope" decision > Calendar Week 19: "Relationship to a namespace" discussion > Calendar Week 20: "Relationship to a namespace" decision > ... > > We would thus > > - clearly separate the "Generic Inline Markup" work from other > activities/discussions > - tackle the different dimensions as separate "work streams" > - have a clear timeline > > With regard to the question "direct changes to the Wiki" vs. "e-mail > thread first", I would slant towards > "direct changes to the Wiki". From my point-of-view this would make it > easier to quickly get an > overview of the state-of-affairs related to a certain dimension. > > @Bryan: Would it still be possible to add discussion around this > e-mail to today's conf. call agenda? Aside: > It is very likely that I will not be able to participate in today's > call. > > Cheers, > Christian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:asgeirf@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:08 AM > To: Lieske, Christian > Cc: yves@opentag.com; bryan s schnabel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [xliff] Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup" > > ----- "Christian Lieske" <christian.lieske@sap.com> wrote: > > Since the e-mail exchange related to the " Generic Inline Markup " > ( > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00006.html ) > > > > - started to get very cluttered from my point-of-view > > > > - from my understanding was meant to be continued by means of a > Wiki > > page > > > > I have take n the time to create this Wiki page at > > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/Requirements > > I moved this page to a URL with a more recognizable name: > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/OneContentModel/Requirements > > The old URL redirects to the new page. > > Finally, a tip: For those of you using RSS readers, you can subscribe > to the latest changes on the wiki through the rss feed linked from > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/RecentChanges > > cheers, > asgeir > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]