OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [xliff] RE: Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup" - Proposal for Next Steps

Hi Asgeir,

Thanks for your efforts. Your input confirms my feeling that the topic is of importance. Thus, I am looking forward to the next step - from my understanding this could be agreement on the time boxing approach I suggested (that is: agreeing on milestones, and setting ourselves deadlines for them).


-----Original Message-----
From: Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:asgeirf@redhat.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:38 AM
To: bryan s schnabel
Cc: Lieske, Christian; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [xliff] RE: Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup" - Proposal for Next Steps

Hi Christian, all,

I have re-written the first section on the wiki-page relating to the 'General Scope' of the inline-content model, in a way that might be more productive to the TC discussion tomorrow.


In Section 3.1. I have re-phrased a lot of the content as questions. Perhaps we can go through these in the meeting in order to arrive at a common scope for this specification. As we go through the points, we can add the agreed scope to Section 3.2. 

I tried to include all of Christian's initial bullet-points in the list of questions, but feel free to edit the wiki adding any additional aspects we need to take into consideration when defining the scope. 


----- "bryan s schnabel" <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote:

> Hi Christian,
> We touched on your proposal a bit in our last meeting. But delayed the
> full discussion until a time when you could attend. Related to your
> idea about a very structured approach, we did all agree that it was
> best to revert back to a requirements gathering phase before we even
> begin to think about the state as it exists currently in XLIFF and
> TMX, or specific ideas for going forward.
> And regarding you thoughts about "direct changes to the Wiki" vs.
> "e-mail thread first," we began that discussion. I'm not sure we
> established a universal approach to have a useful, up-to-date, yet
> in-control wiki.  But we did agree that it will be okay to add
> comments the wiki, as long as each comment has a name and date
> associated with it.
> Thanks for the very useful proposal.  We can certainly discuss it
> further at the next meeting.
> Thanks,
> Bryan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lieske, Christian [mailto:christian.lieske@sap.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:22 PM
> To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [xliff] Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup" -
> Proposal for Next Steps
> Hi there,
> I have just browsed the e-mail traffic of the last days. I saw
> sub-topics such as
> - TMX 2.0 does not have an inline element to store content?
> - XLIFF 2.0 in 3D (Testing the friendship between XLIFF and TMX)
> - Opinion: importance of preserving XML markup and nodes
> - Opinion: Need or not for SUB
> In addition, I re-read the thread around the question how to maintain
> the Wiki
> page.
> Both threads made me wonder if we would benefit from a very structured
> (for example time-boxed) approach
> for continuing our work on the "Generic Inline Markup".
> Accordingly, I would like to propose something along the following how
> lines:
> Calendar Week 17: "General Scope" discussion
> Calendar Week 18: "General Scope" decision
> Calendar Week 19: "Relationship to a namespace" discussion
> Calendar Week 20: "Relationship to a namespace" decision
> ...
> We would thus
> - clearly separate the "Generic Inline Markup" work from other
> activities/discussions
> - tackle the different dimensions as separate "work streams"
> - have a clear timeline
> With regard to the question "direct changes to the Wiki" vs. "e-mail
> thread first", I would slant towards
> "direct changes to the Wiki". From my point-of-view this would make it
> easier to quickly get an
> overview of the state-of-affairs related to a certain dimension.
> @Bryan: Would it still be possible to add discussion around this
> e-mail to today's conf. call agenda? Aside:
> It is very likely that I will not be able to participate in today's
> call.
> Cheers,
> Christian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:asgeirf@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:08 AM
> To: Lieske, Christian
> Cc: yves@opentag.com; bryan s schnabel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [xliff] Wiki Document related to "Generic Inline Markup"
> ----- "Christian Lieske" <christian.lieske@sap.com> wrote:
> > Since the e-mail exchange related to the " Generic Inline Markup "
> (
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200903/msg00006.html )
> >
> > - started to get very cluttered from my point-of-view
> >
> > - from my understanding was meant to be continued by means of a
> Wiki
> > page
> >
> > I have take n the time to create this Wiki page at
> > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/Requirements
> I moved this page to a URL with a more recognizable name:
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/OneContentModel/Requirements
> The old URL redirects to the new page.
> Finally, a tip: For those of you using RSS readers, you can subscribe
> to the latest changes on the wiki through the rss feed linked from
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/RecentChanges
> cheers,
> asgeir
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]