OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [xliff] Proposal for a <group> element

Dear Rodolfo, although I tend to philosophically agree that a singleton does not constitute a group, I think that we cannot prevent authors of source content from creating hierarchies containing just one element at some levels.
IMHO, enforcing 2 child elements for group could be potentially harmful for intuitive representations.

This leads me to the idea that we could also consider empty groups, just a thought, not sure about this one..


Dr. David Filip
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Rodolfo M. Raya <rmraya@maxprograms.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf
> Of Yves Savourel
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:12 PM
> To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [xliff] Proposal for a <group> element

Hi Yves,

> group
> Grouping element.
> Contains:
> - One or more <unit> or <group> elements in any order followed by

The new <group> element should contain 2 or more <unit> or <group> elements. If a <group> contains just one of those element, it is not "grouping" anything.

Rodolfo M. Raya       rmraya@maxprograms.com
Maxprograms       http://www.maxprograms.com

To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]