XLIFF 2.0 - dF Sanity Check of the spec - question for the editors #001

["Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>]

Hi Rodolfo, Yves, all

quality checking the spec to see if I can extract a list of processing requirements validation tests. [However I do not want to discuss this now. If you wish, please do so in a separate thread.]

This series of numbered threads is meant to ask a single simple question at a time. It might happen that they trigger broader discussion but they are not intended so :-)

In the tree structures throughout the spec you consistently use

+---<any> +

IMHO this would mean that implementers must use at least one proprietary extension at all extension points, which seems odd

Do we want to say

+---<any> *

throughout the spec?

Thanks for your attention

dF

Legend:

1 = one

+ = one or more

? = zero or one

* = zero, one or more

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie