[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] discussion points for next Tue agenda
|
1)
Re-segmentation behavior - removing modules and extensions from <segment> etc. [we cannot make a 7 ballot by now, this needs to be resolved during the teleconf] This item is related to comment 028 about improving data referencing in modules. I think that as long as each module that needs to reference a <segment> can
define a “ref” attribute, and potentially an “appliesTo” attribute, as might be the case with <mda:metadata> that can refer to a <segment> or an <ignorable>, then pulling modules and extensions out of <segment> can easily be done. Ryan
From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip Dear Bryan, all, after I updated the comments tracker I determined that we need to resolve the following points in the conference call to stay on track for the next public review in early August. 1) Re-segmentation behavior - removing modules and extensions from <segment> etc. [we cannot make a 7 ballot by now, this needs to be resolved during the teleconf] 2) Order of core, module and extension elements in the general tree [re comment 006, I will post UL proposal for this] 3) General approach to properties and subproperties [needed for comments 021 and 053] 4) Volunteer to UPPERCASE normative keywords through stylesheet [comment 005] You can look for the details why this is needed in the comments tracker.. Thanks and cheers dF
Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto:
david.filip@ul.ie |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]