Subject: RE: [xliff] PR question
144? That one, in my opinion, is just an editorial fix (fixing an inconsistency).
Changing the default for translate is a major change: It implies a lot of coding re-work.
Why not add a new item? Maybe it can be labeled differently to ensure we track the fact it is an internal TC comment rather than an external public comment with time restriction.
Thanks Yves, I agree
I believe this can be fixed in association with 144.
I can take 144 that is currently TBD
Dr. David Filip
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Yves Savourel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I guess I'll answer my own question: