Subject: Call For Dissent for canCopy attribute text
Dear Committee membres,
The issue is around definition of “corresponding” in the following constraint (220.127.116.11 id):
and proper usage of “copyOf” attribute.
As it was pointed out by Yves, the tag for matching inline elements for <source>/<target> pair is “id”. So only if ids match, they must have the same set of attributes (and their values), i.e. if they have identical non-id attributes (and their values), they are not required to share the same id.
With regard to “copyOf”, the confusion is caused mainly because the constraints around the usage of this attribute are in a different section than the description of the attribute (18.104.22.168 copyOf). The following constraints, from sections “4 .7.2.4 Adding Codes” and “ 22.214.171.124.1 Duplicating an Existing Code” respectively, clarify the valid scenario (also mentioned by Fredrik in the original thread):
Therefore, in my opinion, adding a reference to to section “4.7 Inline Content” in the description of “copyOf" attribute (sec 126.96.36.199) will address the issue.