Good, I wanted to
rephrase that sentence anyway. Right now we have "Even though these rules are
RECOMMENDED and not REQUIRED, an implementation that fails to observe them may
experience an unacceptably high number of false negatives."
I'd like to change it
to "To reduce the requirements on a minimally conforming processor, the
majority of these rules are RECOMMENDED rather than REQUIRED. An
implementation that fails to observe them, however, may frequently treat two
XRIs as nonequal when in fact they are equal."
Does that sound
ok?
Dave
-----Original
Message-----
From: Wachob,
Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:41
AM
To:
'xri-editors@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [xri-editors] Feedback on
rc1d
dsr21: "may experience an
unacceptably high numberof false negatives" - its not clear what "false
negatives" means in this context. I would say "may frequently treat two XRIs
as nonequal when if fact they are equal."
section 2.2.4.2 has a cross
reference to section 0 - clearly this is wrong.
Nothing else jumps out at me -
though I've focused mostly on changes. Reviewing old unchanged text tends to
be less effective because of my familiarity with it. Things always slip by -
time for more eyes!!!