[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16
Of all the options discussed, which do you prefer? EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:38 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16 > > Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-07-28: > > If we want to make it extensible, it has to be an attribute (new > element > or > > not). I think we are past that. The only reason to have a new element > is > to > > allow it to use any string and not just URI. My point is that it is > hard > to > > spec how to extract the authority from any string for the trust > profile. > > So, again, what we're really saying is that the extensible aspect is > the > problem, not the structure. > > My opinion is the same as it was before, I don't think it should *be* > extensible. If you want extensible, use some existing mechanism like > POWDER > or whatever. > > -- Scott >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]