xri message

Subject: RE: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema

From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "'Nat Sakimura'" <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:14:51 -0400

Nat Sakimura wrote on 2009-09-08:
> So the conclusion is to drop <extensions> and recommend to use only one
> signature, is that right?

Recommend, or at least confine the definition within the specification to
that.

-- Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema
  - From: Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>

References:
- OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD
  - From: Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>
- Re: [xri] OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD
  - From: Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>
- Re: [xri] OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD
  - From: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>
- RE: [xri] OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD
  - From: "Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@cordance.net>
- Removing ds elements from schema (was: OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD)
  - From: Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>
- Re: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema (was: OpenID Delegatingrelationship in XRD)
  - From: John Bradley <jbradley@mac.com>
- Re: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema (was: OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD)
  - From: Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>
- Re: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema (was: OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD)
  - From: Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>
- RE: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema (was: OpenID Delegatingrelationship in XRD)
  - From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
- Re: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema (was: OpenID Delegating relationship in XRD)
  - From: Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>
- Re: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema
  - From: Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>