Re: Tin Man Design Question 5 - to achieve consensus Jan. 9th?

[Carmelo Montanez <carmelo@nist.gov>]

Hi All:

    No objections here, I will support that line of thinking.

Carmelo
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <David_Marston@lotus.com>
To: <xslt-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 3:16 PM
Subject: Tin Man Design Question 5 - to achieve consensus Jan. 9th?


> Here is one of the issues identified in my message titled
> "Test Case Markup & Cataloging, Tin Man edition" that I sent
> to this list on 12/1/2000:
> 5. Is it okay to refer to versions by number but errata by
>    date? (Note: dates are yyyymmdd)
> 
> DISCUSSION:
> W3C identifies their errata by date. Since dates are in
> yyyymmdd format in our catalog (per Dublin Core), they will
> sort correctly. This is crucial for including/excluding
> tests based on the errata.
> 
> This probably doesn't require a vote unless the discussion
> reveals that two schools of thought exist.
> .................David Marston
> 
>